Thursday, September 22, 2022

The Middle Class and Poor Can't Catch a Break When It Comes to Paying for Health Care

The $18,000 Breast Biopsy: When Having Insurance Costs You a Bundle

When Dani Yuengling felt a lump in her right breast last summer, she tried to ignore it.

She was 35, the same age her mother had been when she received a breast cancer diagnosis in 1997. The disease eventually killed Yuengling’s mom in 2017.

“It was the hardest experience, seeing her suffer,” said Yuengling, who lives in Conway, South Carolina.

After a mammogram confirmed the lump needed further investigation, Yuengling scheduled a breast biopsy for Valentine’s Day this year at Grand Strand Medical Center in Myrtle Beach.

Among many concerns she had ahead of that appointment — the first being a potential cancer diagnosis — Yuengling needed to know how much the biopsy would cost. She has a $6,000 annual deductible — the amount her health plan requires she pay before its contribution kicks in — and she wasn’t close to hitting that. Whatever the procedure cost, Yuengling knew she’d be on the hook for most of it.

But the hospital wouldn’t give her a price. She was told her providers wouldn’t know what type of biopsy needle they needed until the procedure was underway and that would impact the price.

The hospital’s online “Patient Payment Estimator” showed Yuengling an uninsured patient would owe about $1,400 for the procedure.

“That’s fine. No big deal,” she thought to herself, confident it would be cheaper for her because she did have insurance. A Google search indicated it could be closer to $3,000, but Yuengling thought that price seemed reasonable, too. She wasn’t fretting too much about money as she underwent the procedure.

It soon brought the good news that she didn’t have cancer.

Then the bill came.

The Patient: Dani Yuengling, now 36, who is covered by Cigna through her employer, a human resources contractor for the Mayo Clinic.

Medical Service: An ultrasound-guided breast biopsy.

Service Provider: Grand Strand Medical Center, a 403-bed, for-profit hospital in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. It is one of 182 hospitals owned by Nashville-based HCA Healthcare, which generated $58.7 billion in revenue last year.

Total Bill: $17,979 for the procedure, including lab work, pharmacy charges, and sterile supplies. Cigna’s in-network negotiated rate was $8,424.14, of which the insurance company paid the hospital $3,254.47. Yuengling was billed $5,169.67, the balance of her deductible.

What Gives: It’s not uncommon for uninsured patients — or any patient willing to pay a cash price — to be charged far less for a procedure than patients with health insurance. For the nearly 30% of American workers with high-deductible plans, like Yuengling, that means using insurance can lead to a far bigger expense than if they had been uninsured or just pulled out a credit card to pay in advance.

Ge Bai, an associate professor at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, recently published research on this topic and said hospitals in the U.S. often set their cash prices lower than the prices they charge to treat commercially insured patients.

“We can very confidently say this is very common,” said Bai, who advised that all patients, regardless of their insurance status, inquire about the cash price before undergoing a procedure. “It should be a norm.”

Grand Strand charged Yuengling’s insurance an extraordinarily high price for her procedure. By comparison, according to the federal government’s website, Medicare patients who need an ultrasound-guided biopsy similar to the one Yuengling received would pay only about $300 — their required 20% coinsurance for outpatient care. Medicare would pay the hospital the remainder of the bill, about $1,200. The hospital expected more than five times the Medicare price from Yuengling and her insurer.

Patients in Conway with private health insurance who are treated at other hospitals also typically are charged less than what Yuengling paid for the same procedure — on average about $3,500, according to Fair Health Consumer, an organization that analyzes health insurance claims.

And uninsured patients who pay cash prices and need an ultrasound-guided breast biopsy at the nearby Conway Medical Center are likely to owe even less — about $2,100, according to Allyson Floyd, a spokesperson for the hospital.

Meanwhile, Grand Strand Medical Center spokesperson Caroline Preusser blamed “a glitch” involving the hospital’s online calculator for the inaccurate information Yuengling received and said the correct estimate for the cash price for a breast biopsy at the hospital is between $8,000 and $11,500 “depending on the exact procedure and equipment used.”

The hospital removed certain procedures from the payment estimator until they can be corrected, Preusser wrote. She did not say how long that would take.

Resolution: Yuengling tried disputing the charges with the hospital. She called the billing department and was offered a 36% discount, lowering the amount she needed to pay to $3,306.29. Grand Strand Medical Center allows patients to set up payment plans, but Yuengling decided to charge the full amount to a credit card because she wanted the whole thing to go away.

“I could not sleep. It was driving me crazy. I was having migraines. I was sick to my stomach,” she said. “I hate having debt. I didn’t want to think about it. Obviously, that didn’t work because I’m still thinking about it.”

She said she requested on multiple occasions to speak to the hospital’s patient advocate and was eventually connected with an outside company, Parallon, which conducted an audit of her bill. She eventually received a letter dated May 26 from the hospital’s Revenue Integrity Department. It stated: “After a review of the charges in question and your medical record, the following was identified; The charges on your account were appropriate.”

“I don’t know why I actually expected a different outcome,” she said.

The hospital has requested that Yuengling return for a follow-up appointment related to the biopsy. She has refused.

Harlow Sumerford, a spokesperson for HCA Healthcare, told KHN in an email that the hospital system apologizes for any confusion caused by the payment estimator “and we are working to fix the issue.”

The Takeaway: With a family history of breast cancer, Yuengling was right to follow up with her doctor after feeling a lump. After failing to get a clear answer on her costs from Grand Strand Medical Center, she could have taken an additional step to explore what other hospitals in the area charge. Although her physician referred her to Grand Strand, she was not obligated to use that hospital. She could have saved a significant amount of money by opting to undergo the procedure elsewhere.

Related Links

Furthermore, patients like Yuengling who have a high-deductible insurance plan should consider paying cash prices for certain procedures and not involving their insurance company at all.

Jacqueline Fox, a health care attorney and a professor at the University of South Carolina School of Law, said she isn’t aware of any law that would prohibit a patient from doing that. After all, she pointed out, patients with health insurance pay cash prices for prescription medications all the time. It stands to reason they could do the same for medical procedures.

But some facilities make this difficult. Grand Strand Medical Center, for example, offers “self-pay” patients an “uninsured discount,” but that discount is limited to people who have “no third party payer source of payment or do not qualify for Medicaid, Charity or any other discount program the facility offers,” according to the hospital’s website. Only patients confirmed to have no health insurance are offered information about the discount.

In some cases, paying a cash price for a procedure might not make financial sense in the long run because none of it would be applied toward the deductible. Patients might save money on one procedure but end up paying their full deductible if unexpected medical expenses mount later during the calendar year.

Insured patients should reach out to their health plan for a good-faith estimate before a procedure. Under the No Surprises Act, health plans are supposed to give members an idea of their total out-of-pocket costs upon request. Ask for an “Advanced Explanation of Benefits,” said Sabrina Corlette, a research professor at the Georgetown University McCourt School of Public Policy, though she points out this part of the law isn’t being enforced yet.

The No Surprises Act also allows patients to file complaints with the federal government regarding their medical bills — whether or not they carry health insurance.

Yuengling filed her complaint in June.

Stephanie O’Neill contributed the audio portrait with this article.

Bill of the Month is a crowdsourced investigation by KHN and NPR that dissects and explains medical bills. Do you have an interesting medical bill you want to share with us? Tell us about it!

KHN (Kaiser Health News) is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues. Together with Policy Analysis and Polling, KHN is one of the three major operating programs at KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation). KFF is an endowed nonprofit organization providing information on health issues to the nation.

Subscribe to KHN's free Morning Briefing.

Monday, August 29, 2022

Hard Pressed to Find Jesus in the Anti-abortion Movement's Message

I don’t know what caused me more concern about the highly controversial Dobbs v. Jackson decision issued by the United States Supreme Court on June 24, 2022 — the highly probable reprehensible harm it will cause to women and girls (especially poor women and BIPOC women and girls) OR the influence that religious zealots had on this consequential landmark legal ruling. As an ordained minister, whose sociopolitical ideology is deeply rooted in the conservative theology of the Black church, what is particularly disturbing is how many in the anti-abortion movement — in particular Catholics and conservative Evangelical Christians — are claiming a moral high ground based on their religious beliefs. However, if they are basing their religious beliefs on sacred scriptures e.g., the Bible, abortion is not mentioned — neither figuratively, through parables, which Jesus often used, NOR explicitly in any admonitions or teachings of the prophets or chosen leaders and messengers of the Old Testament. Religion is one of the most powerful weapons that have been used throughout history to justify manifold forms of oppression and inhumane treatment including slavery, genocide, classism, war, and patriarchy. When I consider that underneath the façade of ruling solely based on legal precedent and tenets, are the strong religious beliefs of the anti-abortion Supreme Court justices, I wish their decision truly reflected the lessons that Jesus actually taught. For example, it would have been prudent for them to consider the story of the woman who was brought by the religious teachers and leaders to Jesus to be stoned and condemned for committing adultery multiple times (read John 8:1–11, NIV). When the scribes and Pharisees (legal experts and religious teachers of Jesus’ day) were calling for Jesus to condemn the woman and allow them to stone her to death, instead of acquiescing to their demands, Jesus first challenged them by saying “you who is without sin cast the first stone” and then knelt and wrote something on the ground which according to scripture, silenced the woman’s accusers. (I joke sometimes and say that what Jesus wrote on the ground was “Mind Your Business!”) The story fails to shine light into the woman’s background; we don’t know why she had multiple husbands or was with multiple men. Like the woman in this biblical story, we don’t know why a woman makes a decision to have an abortion. Most women and girls make this very difficult decision based on their unique circumstances including physical health risks, financial fitness (or lack thereof), social and family support, or mental and emotional wellbeing. For example, women who are in physically or emotionally abusive relationships; young girls who have been molested by a family member or neighbor; mothers who are already exhausted and burdened being single heads of households; college students or young adults who can barely take care of themselves or whose livelihoods are already dependent on financially-strapped parents, grandparents or others are just a few realities that women and girls face that will lead them to terminate an unwanted, unexpected, or risky pregnancy. The Dobbs decision punishes women and fails to factor in the role and responsibility of men in the equation, just like the woman accused of adultery in the biblical story. In the Dobbs decision or any of the regressive and oppressive state laws coming down the pike, the male factor is not a factor at all. Ironically in the biblical story aforementioned about the woman who was accused of adultery, the woman was brought alone with out her accomplices. What the SCOTUS did on June 24, 2022, and what many states are doing in its aftermath, is enact laws that are heavily influenced (in an inimical way) by dangerous and paternalistic religious dogma. An NPR Marist poll (May 2022) found that 64% of Americans did not want Roe v. Wade overturned, including Christians like myself. Following the Dobb’s decision, polls show that close to 60% of Americans disapproved of the ruling, again, including many Christians. Many of the so-called religious protectors of life are the same people who are missing in action when it comes to advocating for child care to support working moms, or the expansion of Medicaid to help prevent people from dying prematurely or getting sick from a chronic health condition or disease because they can’t afford health insurance. And, they tend to be the same people who see nothing wrong with a violent attempt to overthrow the US government and nothing right about people protesting the murdering of unarmed Black men, women, boys, and girls. They want to protect fetuses in the womb but could seemingly care less about infants in the world being neglected, abused, or dying prematurely. Most Americans clearly understand that abortion, no matter what one’s religious beliefs are on the issue, is none of our business but a personal (not public) decision that should not be litigated in the courts or decided on the floor of state general assemblies. Choosing to have an abortion is a personal and private decision that should be made by a woman (or girl) in consultation with her physician or healthcare provider, and if she believes in God, her God. Also published on Medium at: